Government Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Government - Re await Paper ExampleTrying Jones in the states salute will also attract a maximum sentence unless he pleads guilty whereas the national appeal has comparative leniency of national rules regarding wiretaps and informants which give Jones the possibility of a minimal sentence compared to the former. The circumstance that he helped with the collecting of evidence to build human faces against Smith and Thompson should influence the severity of his sentence in a federal tribunal. Therefore it is my recommendation that once again a federal court is more beneficial because Jones actions of support collect evidence will sway the judges or jury in a federal court. This will go a long way in helping future informants co-operate because they see that there snitching on the others is beneficial to them (Winnfred, 2011). Since no previous records have been found on Smith, the recommendation is to file the case in the Sedgwick County District Court. Smith should be charged with possession and trafficking as a first offender. The prosecuting officer should consider cutting a deal with Smith which will see the reduction of his sentence in exchange for him informing on his suppliers. ... The federal courts also need to issue a warrant to search all of Thompsons premises. Secondly the federal courts offer greater harsher penalties for drug related offences that help discourage people from future trafficking. According to 1993 statistics from the Department of Justice, the average federal sentence for selling powder cocaine was 79 months the average for trafficking in crack cocaine was 141 months. Since Thompson seems to be a big time monger he faces a harsher sentencing. Thompson should also be offered a deal just like Smith by the prosecutor where he faces a less harsh sentence if he is to inform on his suppliers (Harris 2007). The federal courts also offer an avenue for liaising with other courts in other states and other countries unlike the state c ourts in the event that Thompsons suppliers are from different states or countries. Since Jones testimony is key to prosecuting Thompson, the prosecutor should make it spend to the judge that in no way should Jones previous convictions influence the decision made by the court in the trial against Thompson. He should still be viewed as a credible witness disrespect his selfish reasons in informing on Thompson. Looking at the federal law in the linked States, there is no full reception statute provided on the level of federal law that spearheaded rough-cut law and therefore giving power to federal courts to fabricate precedents that were deemed legal. Federal courts culminate from the federal musical composition together with the federal Judicial Acts. On the other hand, people have come to accept the fact that the earlier inhabitants of the United States, by their action of bestowing judicial authority into the highest court of the land